Paper 4 Section A: Can English Remain the Favorite Language?

         At present, English is highly dominant  with “1.5 billion people” speaking the language.  It is also extremely  important for being able to communicate internationally and improve one’s status.  However, English may not always remain this powerful.  English only has “400 million” speakers using it as their first language, and these numbers are dwindling because of increases in usage of other languages and the decreasing reliance on it to communicate globally.  Therefore, it may seem that the English language will ultimately go through language fragmentation.

Currently, English is a highly popular and powerful  language.  According to the article, the author cited a study by the Cambridge University Press that said  “up to 350 million people” in China and “100 million in India” have an understanding of English.  This contributes to the idea of English’s linguistic dominance/imperialism.  Robert Phillipson coined the term in his book Linguistic Imperialism.  His idea can simply be explained as one language that holds control over and dominates other languages so that the dominant language gains control of a country’s political, economic, and social institutions.  This, in turn, results in language death of native languages and thus results in the impoverishment of those who speak the “dead” native language.   Therefore, those who wish to be successful in everyday life must accept the dominant language.  This has obviously been seen in countries such as China and India who want to be able to do business with a global superpower like the United States.

Additionally, according to the text,  English currently “is the world’s favorite lingua franca.”  In reference to English, it means that English is able to be used among speakers from all over the world who speak different native languages in order to communicate with one another.  The article uses the idea of a Chinese speaker and a French speaker who do not know how to speak the other’s language.  The author said “chances are that they would use English.”  This ability to share a common language is very powerful for communication, thus English maintains its current position as being highly useful.  This idea of lingua francas can be seen within Kachru’s concentric circles language model.  The Expanding Circle segment of the chart displays those who use English as a lingua franca.  This segment contains approximately 500-1000 million people.  At present, this displays how many people use English for communication across languages in everyday life, like when participating in business.

However, English in the future will no longer be able to hold the dominance that it currently does today.  Instead, with the emergence of technology, English will likely undergo linguistic fragmentation.  According to the article, computer translation services will be able to outdo human translators as the machines will be able to translate “in real time.”  This will retract from the benefits of a person being multilingual.  In the past, multilingual translators were essential in important cross-communication settings like in trade meetings between countries since the message could be relayed clearly.  Now, however, if a computer is able to translate the information in real time, while most likely having fewer mistakes than human translators, they will be used more often.  Therefore, political figures will no longer need to use English as a common lingua franca nor will they need multilingual translators who speak English.   If this is indeed the case, then in the future, the Expanding Circle section of Kachru’s diagram will diminish since there will not be a need for English for cross-communication.

Additionally, there has been a decrease in the amount of people using English in predominantly English speaking countries, like the United States.  According to the article, around one “fifth of Americans speak a language other than English in their own homes.”  This is highly important. This is because the fewer the people that speak English as their first language in a predominantly English speaking country, the fewer the people in the next generation that will speak English as their mother tongue.  This will ultimately decrease the Inner Circle, as seen in Kachru’s diagram, since  the people in this section speak English as their first language.  English will end up gradually shifting to becoming a second language and another language may take over.  This is supported by internationally renowned linguist David Crystal in one of his interviews.  He said that if other languages gain power and popularity like English did, they can take over English as a dominant language, since the new language will be more useful in the future.  

All in all, although English is highly important and popular currently, English is likely to see a decline in usage due to technological advancements and the introduction of new powerful nations and their corresponding languages.  Therefore, English will then progress through UNESCO’s five  levels of language endangerment and may eventually become obsolete like Latin.


Comments

  1. Hi Kathryn!
    I think you did a great job here in your blog. Being that it was a first for all of us, and nearly half didn't even do it, I believe that you are definitely on track for passing this paper. Looking under the AO1 column, I can see that you have detailed understanding of the text in terms of the meaning, context, and audience. This can be seen as you made several references to points made in the article as well as used background knowledge. With this, you made effective references to specific points that were made throughout the article. Because of this, I would award you 8 marks.
    Now looking under the AO2, I can see that you had an effective expression with a few minor errors that didn't impede communication. Multiple times throughout your response, you exhibited an organized structure of ideas and clearly expressed them. Additionally, the content shown throughout is relevant and as mentioned before, the ideas are developed and structured in an effective manner. Here, I would award you 4 marks.
    Under the AO4 column, I would argue that you had a sophisticated understanding of linguistic issues, concepts, methods and approaches that were represented in the text. You showed this by referencing a variety of information, both background and references from the text. You discussed items like the coinage of the term 'linguistic imperialism' by Robert Phillipson, Kachru's circles, and Crystal's ideas. You showed an effective reference to wider studies of linguistic issues, concepts, methods and approaches as well through elaboration of your evidence provided and inclusion of outside knowledge. Because of this, I would award you 9 marks.
    Total - 21/25

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Kathryn!
    AO1: There is a detailed understanding of the text (meaning/context/audience) this can be seen through your usage of direct references of the text for example, “According to the article,” and “Additionally, according to the text,”. There is also an understanding of the meaning of the text which is seen by the sentence of “However, English in the future will no longer be able to hold the dominance that it currently does today.” Which is the main meaning of the article since it is about English and the future of its status due to advancing technology.
    There is an effective reference to specific points which is seen by the usage of topic sentences at the beginning of the paragraphs for example like, “As the English language is used by more people in other countries rather than Americans who speak it as their first.”
    [8]
    AO2: Sophisticated expression, with a high level of accuracy. I didn’t see any grammatical errors.
    Content is fully relevant; ideas are developed throughout in a sophisticated manner this can be seen through the consistent focus on the task at hand since it is about English and its status as a favorite language. [5]
    AO4: “This contributes to the idea of English’s linguistic dominance/imperialism. Robert Phillipson” for this theory you give an example of how it is relevant to the text by saying that a certain fact cited from the article contributes to the theory and you also explain how the theory is represented in the text which is seen through the cited fact and the ending sentence of the paragraph, “This has obviously been seen in countries such as China and India who want to be able to do business with a global superpower like the United States.” which is consistent of a strong response. “
    [8]
    Total: 21

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts